| Figure
1:
American
Dietetic
Association
Evidence-Based
Nutrition
Recommendations
for
Diabetes
and
the
American
Diabetes
Association
Recommendations
on
the
Same
Topic. |
|
Medical
Nutrition
Therapy |
American
Dietetic
Association |
|
American
Diabetes
Association
Recommendations |
Recommendation
1.
Medical
nutrition
therapy
(MNT)
provided
by
a
registered
dietitian
(RD)
is
recommended
for
individuals
with
type
1
and
type
2
diabetes.
An
initial
series
of
three
to
four
encounters
each
lasting
from
45
to
90
minutes
is
recommended
within
3
to
6
months
of
diagnosis
or
at
first
referral
to
an
RD
for
MNT
for
diabetes.
The
RD should
determine
if
additional
MNT
encounters
are
needed
after
the
initial
series
based
on
the
nutrition
assessment
of
learning
needs
and
progress
towards
desired
outcomes.
Studies
based
on
a
range
in
the
number
(1-5 individual
sessions
or
a
series
of
6-12
group
sessions)
and
length
(45-90
minutes)
report
positive
outcomes
at
1
year
and
longer.
Studies
implementing
a
variety
of
nutrition
interventions
report
a
reduction
in
HbA1c
levels,
and
some
studies
also
report
improved
lipid
profiles,
improved
weight
management,
adjustments
in
medications,
and
reduction
in
the
risk
for
onset
and
progression
of
comorbidities. Strong |
|
Individuals
who
have
prediabetes
or
diabetes
should
receive
individualized
MNT;
such
therapy
is
best
provided
by
a
registered
dietitian
familiar
with
components
of
diabetes
MNT.
(B)
Nutrition
counseling
should
be
sensitive
to
the
personal
needs,
willingness
to
change,
and
ability
to
make
changes
of
the
individual
with
prediabetes
or
diabetes.
(E) |
| |
Recommendation
2.
At
least
one
annual
encounter
is
recommended
to
reinforce
lifestyle
changes
and
to
evaluate
and
monitor
outcomes
that
impact
the
need
for
changes
in
MNT
or
medication.
Studies
involving
regular
lifestyle
intervention
sessions
(up
to
one
per
month)
report
sustained
positive
outcomes
at
one
year
and
longer. Strong |
Recommendation
3.
The
RD
should
assess
usual
food
intake
(focusing
on
carbohydrate),
medication,
metabolic
control
(glycemia,
lipids,
blood
pressure)
and
physical
activity
to
serve
as
the
basis
for
the
nutrition
prescription,
goals
and
intervention.
Research
does
not
support
any
ideal
percentages
of
macronutrients.
Nutrition
guidelines
(eg,
Dietary
Reference
Intakes
[DRI])
that
apply
to
the
general
public
also
apply
to
persons
with
diabetes. Fair |
Recommendation
4.
The
RD
should
monitor
and
evaluate
food
intake,
medication(s),
glycemic
control,
and
physical
activity.
Self-monitoring
of
blood
glucose
is
primary
in
evaluating
the
achievement
of
goals
and
effectiveness
of
MNT. Fair |
|
Carbohydrate |
American
Dietetic
Association |
|
American
Diabetes
Association
Recommendations |
Recommendation
1.
In
persons
on
MNT
alone,
glucose-lowering
medications
or
fixed
insulin
doses,
meal
and
snack
carbohydrate
intake
should
be
kept
consistent
on
a
day-to-day
basis.
Consistency
in
carbohydrate
intake
results
in
improved
glycemic
control. Strong
Recommendation
2.
In
persons
with
type
1
or
type
2
diabetes
who
adjust
their
premeal
insulin
doses
or
on
insulin
pump
therapy,
insulin
doses
should
be
adjusted
to
match
carbohydrate
intake.
This
can
be
accomplished
by
comprehensive
nutrition
education
on
results
interpretation,
counseling
on
strategies
for
self-monitoring,
nutritionrelated
medication
management
and
collaboration
with
the
healthcare
team.
Adjusting
insulin
dose
based
on
planned
carbohydrate
intake
improves
glycemic
control
and
quality
of
life
without
any
adverse
effects.Strong
Recommendation
3.
If
persons
with
diabetes
choose
to
eat
foods
containing
sucrose,
the
sucrose-containing
foods
should
be
substituted
for
other
carbohydrate
foods.
Sucrose
intakes
of
10%
to
35%
of
total
energy
intake
do
not
have
a
negative
effect
on
glycemic
or
lipid
responses
when
substituted
for
isocaloric
amounts
of
starch. Strong
Recommendation
4.
If
use
of
glycemic
index
(GI)
is
proposed
as
a
method
of
meal
planning,
advise
on
the
conflicting
evidence
of
effectiveness
of
this
strategy.
Studies
comparing
high
versus
low
GI
diets
report
mixed
effects
on
HbA1c. Weak
Recommendation
5.
Recommendations
for
fiber
intake
for
people
with
diabetes
are
similar
to
the
recommendations
for
the
general
public
(DRI:
14
g/1,000
kcal).
While
diets
containing
44
to
50
g
fiber
daily
are
reported
to
improve
glycemia;
more
usual
fiber
intakes
(up
to
24
g
daily)
have
not
shown
beneficial
effects
on
glycemia.
It is
unknown
if
freeliving individuals
can
daily
consume
the
amount
of
fiber
needed
to
improve
glycemia. Fair
Recommendation
6.
If
persons
with
diabetes
choose
to
use
nonnutritive
sweeteners
approved
by
the
Food
and
Drug
Administration,
at
levels
that
do
no
exceed
the
Accepted
Daily
Intake,
they
can
be
safely
consumed.
However,
products
containing
nonnutritive
sweeteners
may
contain
energy
and
carbohydrate
that
needs
to
be
accounted
for.
Research
on nonnutritive
sweeteners
report
no
effect
on
changes
in
glycemic
responses. Fair |
|
Monitoring
carbohydrate,
whether
by
carbohydrate
counting,
exchanges,
or
experience-based
estimation
remains
a
key
strategy
in
achieving
glycemic
control.
(A)
A
dietary
pattern
that
includes
carbohydrate
from
fruits,
vegetables,
whole
grains,
legumes,
and
low-fat
milk
is
encouraged
for
good
health.
(B)
Sucrose-containing
foods
can
be
substituted
for
other
carbohydrates
in the
meal
plan
or,
if
added
to
the
meal
plan,
covered
with
insulin
or
other
glucose-lowering
medications.
Care
should
be
taken
to
avoid
excess
energy
intake.
(A)
The
use
of
the
glycemic
index
(GI)
and
load
may
provide
a
modest
additional
benefit
over
that
observed
when
total
carbohydrate
is
considered
alone.
(B)
As
for
the
general
population,
people
with
diabetes
are
encouraged
to
consume
a
variety
of
fiber-containing
foods.
However,
evidence
is
lacking
to
recommend
a
higher
fiber
intake
for
people
with
diabetes
than
for
the
population
as
a
whole.
(B)
Sugar
alcohols
and
nonnutritive
sweeteners
are
safe
when
consumed
within
the
daily
intake
levels
established
by
the
Food
and
Drug
Administration.
(A)
(see
Wheeler
and
colleagues
[39]
for
additional
information
regarding
carbohydrate |
|
Protein |
American
Dietetic
Association |
|
American
Diabetes
Association
Recommendations |
Recommendation
1.
In
persons
with
type
1
or
type
2
diabetes
with
normal
renal
function,
usual
protein
intake
of
approximately
15%
to
20%
of
daily
energy
intake
does
not
need
to
be
changed.
Although
protein
has
an
acute
effect
on
insulin
secretion,
usual
protein
intake
in
long-term
studies
has
minimal
effects
on
glucose,
lipids,
and
insulin
concentrations. Fair
Recommendation
2.
In
persons
with
diabetic
nephropathy,
a
protein
intake
of
1.0
g
or
less/kg/day
is
recommended.
In
persons
with
diabetes,
diets
with
protein
<1.0
g/kg/day
have
been
shown
to
improve
albuminuria;
however,
they
have
not
been
shown
to
have
substantial
effects
on
glomerular
filtration
rates
(GFR). Fair
Recommendation
3.
For
persons
with
later
stage
diabetic
nephropathy
(chronic
kidney
disease
[CKD],
stages
3-5),
hypoalbuminemia
(an
indicator
of
malnutrition),
and
energy
intake
must
be
monitored
and
changes
in
protein
and
energy
intake
made
to
correct
deficits.
A
protein intake
of
approximately
0.7
g/kg/day
has
been
associated
with
hypoalbuminemia,
whereas
a
protein
intake
of
approximately
0.9
g/kg/
day
has
not. Fair |
|
For
individuals
with
diabetes
and
normal
renal
function,
there
is
insufficient
evidence
to
suggest
that
usual
protein
intake
(15-20%
of
energy)
should
be
modified.
(E)
In
individuals
with
type
2
diabetes,
ingested
protein
can
increase
insulin
response
without
increasing
plasma
glucose
concentrations.
Therefore,
protein
should
not
be
used
to
treat
acute
or
prevent
nighttime
hypoglycemia.
(A)
Reduction
of
protein
intake
to
0.8
to
1.0
g/kg/day
in
individuals
with
diabetes
and
the
earlier
stages
of
CKD
and
to
0.8
g/kg/day
in
the
later
stages
of
CKD
may
improve
measures
of
renal
function
(urine
albumin
excretion
rate,
glomerular
filtration
rate)
and
is
recommended.
(B) |
|
Weight
Management |
American
Dietetic
Association |
|
American
Diabetes
Association
Recommendations |
Recommendation
1.
If
weight
loss
is
a
goal
for
persons
with
type
2
diabetes
who
are
overweight
or
obese,
the
RD
should
advise
that
glycemic
control
is
the
primary
focus.
While
decreasing
energy
intake
may
improve
glycemic
control,
it
is
unclear
whether
weight
loss
alone
will
improve
glycemic
control.
Sustained
weight
loss
interventions
lasting
one
year
or
longer
report
inconsistent
effects
on
HbA1c.
The
addition
of
weight
loss medications
to
lifestyle
interventions
modestly
improves
weight
management
outcomes. Fair
(For
more
specific
recommendations
on
weight
management,
see
the
ADA
Adult
Weight
Management
Evidence-Based
Nutrition
Guidelines
[40].) |
|
In
overweight
and
obese
insulin-resistant
individuals,
modest
weight
loss
has
been
shown
to
improve
insulin
resistance.
Thus,
weight
loss
is
recommended
for
all
such
individuals
who
have
or
are
at
risk
for
diabetes.
(A)
Structured
programs
that
emphasize
lifestyle
changes,
including
education,
reduced
energy
and
fat
(30%
of
total
energy)
intake,
regular
physical
activity,
and
regular
participant
contact,
can
produce
long-term
weight
loss
on
the
order
of
5-7%
of
starting
weight.
Thus,
lifestyle
change
should
be
the
primary
approach
to
weight
loss.
(A)
Low-carbohydrate
diets
(restricting
total
carbohydrate
to
<130
g/day) are
not
recommended
in
the
treatment
of
overweight/obesity.
The
longterm
effects
of
these
diets
are
unknown
and
although
such
diets
produce
short-term
weight
loss,
maintenance
of
weight
loss
is
similar
to
that
from
low-fat
diets
and
impact
on
cardiovascular
disease
(CVD)
risk
profile
is
uncertain.
(B)
Weight-loss
medications
may
be
considered
in
the
treatment
of
overweight
and
obese
individuals
with
type
2
diabetes
and
can
help
achieve
a
5-10%
weight
loss
when
combined
with
lifestyle
modification. (B)
Bariatric
surgery
may
be
considered
for
some
individuals
with
type
2
diabetes
and
BMI >35
and
can
result
in
marked
improvements
in
glycemia.
The
long-term
benefits
and
risks
of
bariatric
surgery
in
individuals
with
diabetes
continue
to
be
studied.
(B)
(see
Apovian
and
Cummings
[41]
for
additional
information
on
obesity
surgery
and
medications) |
|
Physical
Activity |
American
Dietetic
Association |
|
American
Diabetes
Association
Recommendations |
Recommendation
1.
In
persons
with
type
2
diabetes,
90
to
150
minutes
of
accumulated moderate-intensity
physical
activity
per
week
and/or
resistance/strength
training
distributed
over
at
least
three
days
per
week
and
with
no
more
than
two
consecutive
days
without
physical
activity
is
recommended.
Both
aerobic
and
resistance
training
improve
glycemic
control,
independent
of
weight
loss.
Physical
activity
also
improves
insulin
sensitivity
and
decreases
risk
for
cardiovascular
disease
and
all-cause
mortality. Strong
Recommendation
2.
Although
exercise
is
not
reported
to
improve
glycemic
control
in persons
with
type
1
diabetes,
individuals
are
encouraged
to
engage
in
regular
physical
activity
to
receive
the
same
benefits
from
exercise
as
the
general
public—decreased
risk
for
cardiovascular
disease
and
improved
sense
of
well-being. Fair
Recommendation
3.
The
RD
should
instruct
individuals
on
insulin
or
insulin
secretagogues
on
the
safety
guidelines
to
prevent
hypoglycemia
frequent
blood
glucose
monitoring
and
possible
adjustment
in
insulin
dose
or
carbohydrate
intake). Fair |
|
To
improve
glycemic
control,
assist
with
weight
maintenance,
and
reduce
risk
of
CVD,
at
least
150
min/week
of
moderate-intensity
aerobic
physical
activity
(50-70%
of
maximum
heart
rate)
and/or
at
least
90
min/week
of
vigorous
aerobic
exercise
(70%
of
maximum
heart
rate)
is
recommended.
The
physical
activity
should
be
distributed
over
at
least
3
day/week
and
with
no
more
than
2
consecutive
days
without
physical
activity.
(A)
In
the
absence
of
contraindications,
people
with
type
2
diabetes
should
be
encouraged
to
perform
resistance
exercise
3
times
a
week,
targeting
all
major
muscle
groups,
progressing
to
three
sets
of
8-10
repetitions
at
a
weight
that
cannot
be
lifted
more
than
8-10
times.
(A) |
|
Self-Monitoring
of
Glucose |
American
Dietetic
Association |
|
American
Diabetes
Association
Recommendations |
Recommendation
1.
For
individuals
on
nutrition
therapy
alone
or
nutrition
therapy
in
combination
with
glucose-lowering
medications,
self-monitoring
of
blood
glucose
(SMBG)
is
recommended.
Frequency
and
timing
is
dependent
on
diabetes
management
goals
and
therapies
(i.e.,
MNT,
diabetes
medications
and
physical
activity).
When
SMBG
is
incorporated
into diabetes
education
programs
and
the
information
from
SMBG
is
used
to
make
changes
in
diabetes
management,
SMBG
is
associated
with
improved
glycemic
control. Fair
Recommendation
2.
R2.
For
persons
with
type
1
or
type
2
diabetes
on
insulin
therapy,
at
least
three
to
eight
blood
glucose
tests
per
day
are
recommended
to
determine
the
accuracy
of
the
insulin
dose(s)
and
to
guide
adjustments
in
insulin
dose(s),
food
intake
and
physical
activity.
Some
insulin
regimens
require
more
testing
to
establish
the
best
integrated
therapy
(insulin,
food,
and
activity).
Once
established,
some
insulin
regimens
will
require
less
frequent
SMBG.
Intervention
studies
that
include
selfmanagement
training
and
adjustment
of
insulin
doses
based
on
SMBG
result
in
improved
glycemic
control. Strong
Recommendation
3.
Persons
experiencing
unexplained
elevations
in
HbA1c
or
unexplained
hypo-
and
hyperglycemia
may
benefit
from
the
use
of
continuous
glucose
monitoring
(CGM)
or
more
frequent
SMBG
may
be
warranted.
It
is
essential
that
persons
with
diabetes
receive
education
as
to
how
to
calibrate
CGM
and
how
to
interpret
CGM
results.
Studies
have
proven
the
accuracy
of
CGM
and
most
show
that
that
using
the
trend/pattern
data
from
CGM
can
result
in
less
glucose
variability
and
improved
glucose
control. Fair |
|
Clinical
trials
using
insulin
that
have
demonstrated
the
value
of
tight
glycemic
control
have
used
SMBG
as
an
integral
part
of
the
management
strategy.
(A)
SMBG
should
be
carried
out
3
or
more
times
daily
for
patients
using
multiple
insulin
injections.
(A)
For
patients
using
less
frequent
insulin
injections
or
oral
agents
or
MNT
alone,
SMBG
is
useful
in
achieving
glycemic
goals.
(E)
To
achieve
postprandial
glucose
target,
postprandial
SMBG
may
be
appropriate.
(E)
Instruct
the
patient
in
SMBG
and
routinely
evaluate
the
patient’s
technique
and
ability
to
use
data
to
adjust
therapy.
(E) |
|
Prevention
and
Treatment
of
CVD |
American
Dietetic
Association |
|
American
Diabetes
Association
Recommendations |
Recommendation
1.
After
focusing
on
achieving
glycemic
control,
cardioprotective
nutrition
interventions
for
the
prevention
and
treatment
of
CVD
should
be
implemented
in
the
initial
series
of
encounters.
Diabetes
is
associated
with
an
increased
risk
for
CVD
and
improved
glycemic
control
and
nutrition
interventions
may
improve
the
lipid
profile. Strong
Recommendation
2.
Cardioprotective
nutrition
interventions
for
the
prevention
and
treatment
of
CVD
include
reduction
in
saturated
and
trans
fats
and
dietary
cholesterol,
and
interventions
to
improve
blood
pressure.
Studies
in
persons
with
diabetes
utilizing
these
interventions
report
a
reduction
in
cardiovascular
risk
and
improved
cardiovascular
outcomes. Strong |
|
Limit
saturated
fat
to
<7%
of
total
calories.
(A)
Intake
of
trans
fat
should
be
minimized.
(E)
In
individuals
with
diabetes,
limit
dietary
cholesterol
to
<200
mg/day.(E)
Two
or
more
servings
of
fish
per
week
(with
the
exception
of
commercially
fried
fish
filets)
provide
n-3
polyunsaturated
fatty
acids
and
are
recommended.
(B)
Target
HbA1c
is
as
close
to
normal
as
possible
without
substantial
hypoglycemia.
(B)
For
patients
at
risk
for
CVD,
diets
high
in
fruits,
vegetables,
whole
grains,
and
nuts
may
reduce
the
risk.
(C)
For
patients
with
diabetes
and
symptomatic
heart
failure,
dietary
sodium
intake
of
<2,000
mg/day
may
reduce
symptoms.
(C)
In
normotensive
and
hypertensive
individuals,
a
reduced
sodium
intake
(eg,
2,300
mg/day)
with
a
diet
high
in
fruits,
vegetables,
and
low-fat
dairy
products
lowers
blood
pressure.
(A)
In
most
individuals,
a
modest
amount
of
weight
loss
beneficially
affects
blood
pressure.
(C) |
|
Figure
1.
American
Dietetic
Association
evidence-based
nutrition
recommendations
for
diabetes
and
the
American
Diabetes
Association
recommendations
on
the
same
topic.
American
Dietetic
Association
Statement
Rating:
- Strong=the
benefits
of
the
recommended
approach
clearly
exceed
the
harms
(or
the
harms
clearly
exceed
the
benefits,
and
the
quality
of
the
supporting
evidence
is
grade
I
or
II;
- Fair=the
benefits
exceed
the
harms
(or
the
harms
clearly
exceed
the
benefits)
but
the
quality
of
the
evidence
is
grade
II
or
III;
- Weak=the
quality
of
the
evidence
is
suspect or
that
well-done
studies
(grade
I,
II,
or
III)
show
little
clear
advantage
of
one
approach
versus
another:
- Consensus=Expert
opinion
(grade
IV)
supports
the
recommendation;
- Insufficient
Evidence=there
is
both
a
lack
of
pertinent
evidence
(grade
V)
and/or
an
unclear
balance
between
benefits
and
harms.
American
Diabetes
Association
Statement
Rating:
- A)=clear
evidence
from
well-conducted,
generalizable,
randomized
controlled
trials
that
are
adequately
powered;
- (B)=supportive
evidence
from
well-conducted
cohort
studies;
- (C)=supportive
evidence
from
poorly
controlled
or
uncontrolled
studies.
- (E)=evidence
is
not
available,
expert
opinion
recommendations
are
based
on
expert
consensus
or
clinical
experience.
Source:
American
Dietetic
Association.
Evidence
Analysis
Library,
http://www.adaevidencelibrary.com.
(32);
American
Diabetes
Association.
Nutrition
recommendations
and
interventions
for
diabetes
(12)
and
Standards
of
medical
care
in
diabetes—2007
(38). |
| |
|
|